Sophie highlights how society imposes contradictory and performative expectations on disabled people.

Hareem claims that Western powers weaponise feminist rhetoric to justify imperialist violence.

Anna contends that Dubai’s promise of insulation from Middle Eastern instability was always precarious, and recent conflict exposes how wealth cannot ultimately shield a city from geography, politics, or human consequences.

Andrei argues that Trump’s war on Iran is incoherent and contradictory, with no clear strategy, and appears largely driven by Netanyahu’s political interests.

Amy argues that elitist attitudes at LSE, rooted in unexamined class privilege and reinforced by superficial markers of academic prestige, are both sociologically unfounded and hypocritical.

Willow explores how Keir Starmer’s vague promise of “change” turned an electoral victory into a governing problem.

Tommy argues that social media amplifies Freud’s ‘death drive’ by enabling anonymous aggression and weakening the civilising constraints of real-world interaction.

Jahnavi critiques how popular awards shows like the Oscars and Grammys shape cultural taste through marketing budgets and Western bias.