Why the answer to your problems isn’t a Summer Ball
It’s no secret how lonely LSE can be. The Beaver has reported time and time again how mental health is a serious and insufficiently addressed problem on campus. It is because of this that I applaud anyone who tries to find ways to fix it. But the answer to our problems isn’t a Summer Ball.
Being an end of year event, it does little to ease the loneliness felt throughout the year; it does little to remedy the lack of a community spanning outside of LSELove; and it does little to tackle the cut-throat, career-focused culture that consumes our campus. If it’s just a room full of rich kids strutting in their designer suits and gowns for the sake of a few pics for Instagram, count me out. Change is going to need to be more substantial than that.
That being said, if all goes well, you’ll probably see me there. The plan for a Summer Ball isn’t a bad one. I like the occasional odd reason to get dressed up and drunk. However, with such a stir that this has caused on campus – from the massively popular petition to being a core policy proposal in the elections for GenSec last year – the idea seems to be that a Summer Ball would be akin to divine intervention: the key to uplifting our dismal student satisfaction ratings.
The LSE community can’t see one single event as the answer to our prayers. Many see LSE as a factory for creating cookie-cutter individuals for the City, forcing the pressure of internships and spring weeks down our necks. Because of this, it can be a cold environment in which to spend your early twenties, with insufficient care for students’ wellbeing and a lack of community feel. For me, I found my community at The Beaver, and others have found their haven elsewhere. But why are we pretending that this one event will be to everyone’s taste and that it will become one huge unifying moment for us all?
The road to implementing an LSE Summer Ball has been long fought and with good intentions. I am glad to see it finally being put in place. However, we can’t look at this one event and think that our problems will be fixed forever. LSE’s problems are more deeply entrenched than that.
Hareem looks at how as we increasingly outsource our thinking to AI, we risk losing intellectual agency, cognitive skills, and even the ability to recognise truth from manipulation.
Nhu Hong explores how the creation of women only spaces isn’t helping solve the root cause of safety for women; and is instead a step back for women’s rights.
Lydia examines the dangers of going cashless: including how it infringes on privacy, causes digital dependence, and allows corporations to take advantage.
Sarah looks at how the US-led “promise of democracy” in Iraq is a warning for Venezuela, showing how liberation through intervention can quickly turn into exploitation and long-term instability.
Why the answer to your problems isn’t a Summer Ball
It’s no secret how lonely LSE can be. The Beaver has reported time and time again how mental health is a serious and insufficiently addressed problem on campus. It is because of this that I applaud anyone who tries to find ways to fix it. But the answer to our problems isn’t a Summer Ball.
Being an end of year event, it does little to ease the loneliness felt throughout the year; it does little to remedy the lack of a community spanning outside of LSELove; and it does little to tackle the cut-throat, career-focused culture that consumes our campus. If it’s just a room full of rich kids strutting in their designer suits and gowns for the sake of a few pics for Instagram, count me out. Change is going to need to be more substantial than that.
That being said, if all goes well, you’ll probably see me there. The plan for a Summer Ball isn’t a bad one. I like the occasional odd reason to get dressed up and drunk. However, with such a stir that this has caused on campus – from the massively popular petition to being a core policy proposal in the elections for GenSec last year – the idea seems to be that a Summer Ball would be akin to divine intervention: the key to uplifting our dismal student satisfaction ratings.
The LSE community can’t see one single event as the answer to our prayers. Many see LSE as a factory for creating cookie-cutter individuals for the City, forcing the pressure of internships and spring weeks down our necks. Because of this, it can be a cold environment in which to spend your early twenties, with insufficient care for students’ wellbeing and a lack of community feel. For me, I found my community at The Beaver, and others have found their haven elsewhere. But why are we pretending that this one event will be to everyone’s taste and that it will become one huge unifying moment for us all?
The road to implementing an LSE Summer Ball has been long fought and with good intentions. I am glad to see it finally being put in place. However, we can’t look at this one event and think that our problems will be fixed forever. LSE’s problems are more deeply entrenched than that.
The Beaver
Share:
Related Posts
“We aren’t people anymore, we’re candidates.”
Nina looks at how in an increasingly competitive job market, all our hobbies and interests are defiend by whether they look good on a CV.
Uploading Our Minds Whilst Deleting Our Brains – Exploring the consequences of cognitive decline in the age of artificial intelligence.
Hareem looks at how as we increasingly outsource our thinking to AI, we risk losing intellectual agency, cognitive skills, and even the ability to recognise truth from manipulation.
Band-Aids on a systemic wound: Women-only carriages won’t protect us.
Nhu Hong explores how the creation of women only spaces isn’t helping solve the root cause of safety for women; and is instead a step back for women’s rights.
What are the Costs of a Cashless Future?
Lydia examines the dangers of going cashless: including how it infringes on privacy, causes digital dependence, and allows corporations to take advantage.
From Iraq to Venezuela: is this what you want?
Sarah looks at how the US-led “promise of democracy” in Iraq is a warning for Venezuela, showing how liberation through intervention can quickly turn into exploitation and long-term instability.